<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Criticism 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbanomnibus.net/2009/03/on-criticism-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbanomnibus.net/2009/03/on-criticism-4/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:14:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: faslanyc</title>
		<link>http://urbanomnibus.net/2009/03/on-criticism-4/comment-page-1/#comment-5948</link>
		<dc:creator>faslanyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanomnibus.net/?p=3118#comment-5948</guid>
		<description>ridiculous.  criticism should be about the work.  you&#039;re right that architecture is egos, politics, history, etc.  but criticism shouldn&#039;t focus on the sensational news, but rather the work.

who cares what&#039;s most interesting?  writers always looking for an interesting angle in order to justify their paycheck.  but criticism carries a bigger responsibility as part of the feedback loop that ultimately improves the work itself.

architectural criticism should not be further tmz-ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ridiculous.  criticism should be about the work.  you&#8217;re right that architecture is egos, politics, history, etc.  but criticism shouldn&#8217;t focus on the sensational news, but rather the work.</p>
<p>who cares what&#8217;s most interesting?  writers always looking for an interesting angle in order to justify their paycheck.  but criticism carries a bigger responsibility as part of the feedback loop that ultimately improves the work itself.</p>
<p>architectural criticism should not be further tmz-ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
