<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Criticism: Is Architecture Criticism Still Architecture Criticism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbanomnibus.net/2009/03/on-criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbanomnibus.net/2009/03/on-criticism/</link>
	<description>Exploring the culture of citymaking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:28:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec Appelbaum</title>
		<link>http://urbanomnibus.net/2009/03/on-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Appelbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanomnibus.net/?p=2858#comment-111</guid>
		<description>When easy credit vanished, the aura of power surrounding glossy renderings popped. We can&#039;t presume to treat a design for a building as a snapshot from the future. It no longer seems conscientious to cover architecture merely as entertainment, a lulling series of pictures. It seems timely to cover it as economic activity, scientific progress and human ego. I&#039;m trying to show cities&#039; changes as a series of decisions that readers can interrupt. By writing about what a design would cost or where its logic buckles, we reporters can help readers feel like owners of their cities- as emotional as sports fans following their teams- and not like passive viewers of spectacle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When easy credit vanished, the aura of power surrounding glossy renderings popped. We can&#8217;t presume to treat a design for a building as a snapshot from the future. It no longer seems conscientious to cover architecture merely as entertainment, a lulling series of pictures. It seems timely to cover it as economic activity, scientific progress and human ego. I&#8217;m trying to show cities&#8217; changes as a series of decisions that readers can interrupt. By writing about what a design would cost or where its logic buckles, we reporters can help readers feel like owners of their cities- as emotional as sports fans following their teams- and not like passive viewers of spectacle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

