Attention Urban Omnibus readers! Last year, our first annual essay competition garnered over 80 thought-provoking essays from around the world, each of which reflected on the Manhattan street grid. Today, we are pleased to announce our second annual essay competition, on the topic of cost, metrics, and measurement in urban life. With this competition, Urban Omnibus invites writers to infuse the quantitative language that pervades environmental understanding with narrative, theory, history, or humor. In so doing, we seek to advance our dedication to redefining the culture of citymaking by questioning how we talk about urban, environmental challenges. Read on for a complete description, download it in PDF form here, and spread this call for essays widely.
DEADLINE: Friday, March 22nd, 5:00pm EDT
The deadline for this competition has passed.
“The City That Never Shouts” by Steven Higashide
What are the metrics or dimensions that govern your behavior in a city?
What are the “costs” and what are the “benefits” of living or working in a city?
How do you quantify your actions – literally or figuratively – in ecological, economic, or political terms?
For our second annual competition for evocative, non-fiction writing, Urban Omnibus is soliciting essays that reflect on the topic of cost, metrics, and measurement in urban life. Environmental imperatives – and the urgency of shocking people out of climate change complacency – have accelerated the quantification of consumption habits and settlement patterns. This quantitative turn, supported by the availability of big data, has distracted us from unpacking the qualitative, cultural attitudes that underlie political inaction. Meanwhile, the cost of some of what we consume in cities – like real estate – is reflected in its price structure, yet a lot of it – like parking, parks, or pollution – is not. Even if the environmental benefits of urban density are starting to be understood, an accepted calculus of a city’s externalities remains far from precise, subsumed in a metaphorical language of carbon footprints or numerical valuations like LEED.
So let’s put it in personal terms. How do you measure your behavior: In rent? In square feet? The number of laps run around the park? MetroCard swipes? Brand of lightbulb? The distance food travels to end up on your plate? What are urban public goods – drinking water, open space, public access television, fireworks displays – worth to you?
Essays might propose an alternative data set of quality of life indicators, relate a personal story of home economics, find the comedy in cap and trade, argue for or against the right to free parking, imagine the interior monologue of New York’s 1,000,000th tree.
The jury will select one first-prize essay, whose author will receive an award of $500. Up to two second place winners will receive prizes of $250 each. The selected winners will also be published on Urban Omnibus.
Essays should be between 800 and 2000 words. Suggestions of imagery to support or illustrate the essay are strongly encouraged. Submissions must be emailed as letter-sized PDFs. The applicant’s name and essay title must appear at the top of the first page of the PDF. Email submissions to email@example.com with “FUZZY MATH: ESSAY SUBMISSION” as the subject line. Submissions must be received by 5:00pm EDT on Friday, March 22nd, 2013. Late submissions will not be accepted. Questions about this call for essays can be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org. Winners will be announced in April.
Staff and board members of the Architectural League are not eligible for this competition. All others are encouraged to submit. The criteria for selection include the quality of the prose, the originality of the interpretive position on cities, and the extent to which an essay provokes readers to discover something new or surprising in a familiar urban condition.
Michelle Addington is the Hines Professor of Sustainable Architectural Design at the Yale School of Architecture and a professor at the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. She researches discrete systems and technology transfer, and she serves as an adviser on energy and sustainability for many organizations, including the Department of Energy and the American Institute of Architects. In addition to architecture, her background includes the design of components for unmanned spacecraft at NASA / Goddard Space Flight Center and work as a power plant engineer and manufacturing supervisor at DuPont. Prior to teaching at Yale, Professor Addington taught at Harvard University, Temple University and Philadelphia University.
Andrew Blum is a contributing editor at Urban Omnibus and the author of Tubes: A Journey to the Center of the Internet, the first book-length look at the physical heart of the Internet itself. When not immersed in the Internet’s depths, Blum writes about architecture, design, technology, urbanism, art, and travel.
Philip Kay is finishing a book called ‘Guttersnipes’ & ‘Eliterates’: City College in the Popular Imagination, the story of seventy years of tabloid scandals involving communist professors, crooked basketball players, ill-prepared students, and other polarizing figures at New York’s fabled “Harvard of the Poor.” He teaches media culture at the College of Staten Island, CUNY, and is the translator of the Barcelona-based, biannual magazine, D’Ur: Architecture, Urbanism & Cities Now. Kay’s essay “Transgressing the Grid: Adventures On (and off) Manhattan Island” was the winner of the first annual Urban Omnibus writing competition.
Rosalie Genevro, Executive Director, The Architectural League of New York
Cassim Shepard, Editor, Urban Omnibus
Varick Shute, Digital Editorial Director, The Architectural League of New York
Shin-pei Tsay is the director of Cities and Transportation in the Energy and Climate Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Her research focuses on urban and regional planning issues, particularly in relation to transportation, economic development, energy, and climate change policy.
Andrew Wade, Mills Fellow, The Architectural League of New York
The views expressed here are those of the authors only and do not reflect the position of The Architectural League of New York.